Warland EE and Warland Airland is a better game with realism in mind. But then, it's not a really a strong leap in gaming. The only good thing is the true sight mechanic. Won't trust the Metacritic? Just check the Steam reviews, you can see some reviewers have invested 300+ hours to the game and still, they give negative reviews. If i have to make ranks i'd say: coh1<this is not the case in coh1, capture points system is better), better balance, better UI (easier to see and select your units on the screen) more content, more details, more custom content (custom maps and skin available easily), better combat interaction (no more terminator iron cross soldiers or invincible veterancy 3 panther like in coh1).Ī better atmosphere, better looking graphics (even with less details than coh2 it got better overall graphics), better animation (tanks feel heavy unlike the toyish coh2 tanks), better effect (explosions and weapon fire are more beautifull). True sight, better lobby, bigger community, better gameplay (infantry climbing fences. if i have to compare coh 2 have more pros than coh 1. alot of coh 1 players cried because of the dlc. I have both but only time to learn one of them. Just want to ask what makes CoH1 "more fun" and why isn't 2 as fun as the 1st. Originally posted by ishmokin:Guys, I played CoH 2 but never really played 1.
0 kommentar(er)
